Bing image |
Villain. Favorite? Not two words I would usually put
together. In fact, when I read the topic my dimwittedness showed in a muttered,
“Huh?” Several moments, rather days
later, I had to admit I could recall very few villains. In a lot of the books I
read, character flaws are the “villains.”
In my favorite murder mysteries, the killer is the villain. I find very little to admire or like in any
of those. The only villain I could originally think of as anything close to
favorite is Donatien in my Honour Series. When I contemplated why I decided it
was because I have been in his mind and skin far deeper than in any book I’ve
ever read. He has surprised me by being good
as well as evil when I didn’t think there was an ounce of good in him. Perhaps he’ll turn out to be like
Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, prince de
Bénévent.
Tallyrand was initially a bishop in pre-revolutionary France. He joined the heroes of the Terror, changed
once again in the Directory and then again when Napoleon declared himself
Emperor. Tallyrand even managed to forge
a place for himself in the Bourbon Restoration after Napoleon’s defeat. He would make an excellent villain.
So, what makes a good villain. Taking a page from Penny’s always informative posts, I did some searching.
Villainous Characters begins with the definition: "The classic villain is the antithesis of the hero, being bad where the hero is good, selfish where the
hero is selfless, harming others where the hero saves them.” This opposite-ness
is particularly useful in the contrast that it provides between the hero and
the villain. In this way, they each define the other.” There follows eighteen villain types with
brief definitions.
1 comments:
Thanks for sharing such super links, Joan. I'm looking forward to going back and delving further into the articles.
Post a Comment